Home » News » Lower East Side Poem

Lower East Side Poem

Group 5

Our group focused on analyzing and looking into the “Lower East Side” poem, by Miguel Pinero.  

The Lower East side is located in manhattan and the words mean nothing to someone who had not lived there. However to Miguel Pinero it was a way of life and his home. The description in the poem does not depict the neighborhood as a beautiful and safe one however it talks about the truth such as the criminals and imperfections. The reiteration of spreading his ashes throughout the Lower East side shows how much he means it and his love for the neighborhood. There he fits in with others and he is with his community. I find this poem relatable because I used to live in Sunset however I moved to Flatbush at the age of 11. I feel out of place here, on the other hand in the sunset I feel with my people. In flatbush I feel alienated and not as comfortable as I did with sunset although, just like Miguel Pinero, had gangs and drugs flowing throughout my neighborhood. Miguel Pinero was a co-founder of the Nuyorican literary movement which is empowering for Latino’s as a whole. Miguel Pinero was also part of the young lords who shook the world and even held meetings in the Lower East Side. This neighborhood is bigger than just a home; it is also a piece of history and a reminder that we are strong together. The young lords not only gave food to the needy and created hospitals in order to help out other minorities protested in ways that affected the city so that they were not to be ignored and it was so empowering to all hispanics. The Nuyorican put the beliefs of struggling latinos into words and the young lords put it into action and I think it is one of the greatest things I have ever learned about in both of my PRLS classes.

Recent Posts Across the Commons

  • Profile picture of Mehribon Asadova

    This editorial cartoon […] “”

  • Profile picture of Atharva Orpe

    Events and Opportunities July 1-31Talks Spoken Word, Bespoke Music Spoken Word, Bespoke Music is the culmination of an innovative class sponsored by the Teaching and […]

  • Profile picture of Anthony Picciano

    When It Comes to Housing – The Whole Country Is Starting to Look Like California Housing Affordability on the Rise. Courtesy of Seeking Alpha. Dear Commons Community, The Atlantic has a featured article this morning […]

  • Profile picture of Anthony Picciano

    Dan Rather on Paramount’s $16 Million Trump Settlement: ‘It Was a Sell-Out to Extortion by the President’ Dan Rather Dear Commons Community, Legendary former CBS News anchor Dan Rather expressed disappointment yesterday at Paramount […]

  • Profile picture of Karim Elmenshawy

     When Research Claims Don't Match Reality The cartoon’s bold claim—”OBVIOUSLY OUR HUGE COMMITMENT TO RESEARCH DRIVES UP DRUG COSTS!”—with its intentional misspellings and questionable statistics perfectly illustrates Chapter 6’s discussion of research validity (p. 18) and motivational factors in communication research (p. 22). The exaggerated confidence mirrors how research findings can be distorted when agendas override academic rigor. I witnessed this during a psychology class experiment where students were asked to analyze anti-drug PSA effectiveness. One group—echoing the cartoon’s overstatement—claimed their survey “proved” scare tactics reduced teen drug use by 80%. However, when we examined their methodology (p. 15), we found they’d only surveyed 10 classmates and ignored questions about sample diversity. The textbook’s warning about convenience sampling (p. 16) came alive: their “obvious” conclusion collapsed under scrutiny, much like the cartoon’s dubious drug price claim. This connects to the chapter’s ideological criticism section (p. 30) about how research can serve agendas. Last semester, a pharmaceutical company rep visited campus citing “definitive research” that their ADHD medication was superior. Yet when we checked the peer-reviewed studies (p. 25), we found the research was company-funded and excluded patients with side effects. The cartoon’s garbled “Huge Commmitment” (government?) hints at this tension between public interest and […] ” When Research Claims Don’t Match Reality”

  • Profile picture of Karim Elmenshawy

    The Gap Between Leadership Theory and Reality The cartoon’s intentional errors—”EFFECTIVE COMMUNICASHUN ESSENTIAL FOR LEEDERSHIPS”—visually demonstrate Chapter 5’s key concept: leadership communication theories often get distorted in practice. This aligns with the textbook’s critique of trait approaches (p. 18), where oversimplified formulas (“I learnt it on my management course”) fail to account for real-world complexity. I experienced this disconnect during a summer internship at a marketing firm. Our manager completed an expensive leadership program, then insisted we use its rigid “5-step communication model” for client meetings. The results were awkward and ineffective—clients visibly bristled at the unnatural scripting. The chapter’s Human Rules Paradigm (p. 22) explains why: successful communication depends on contextual adaptation, not memorized scripts. When I quietly abandoned the formula and responded authentically to clients’ concerns, deal closures increased by 30%. This mirrors the Critical Theory Paradigm’s warning (p. 30) about how corporate training often prioritizes profit over people. My manager earned a promotion for “implementing leadership best practices,” while the junior staff who actually adapted to client needs received no credit. The cartoon’s misspellings symbolize this gap between theoretical ideals and workplace realities. The solution lies in Systems Theory (p. 25). When I began tailoring my communication style to each client’s personality (formal for corporate clients, casual for startups), my performance reviews improved dramatically. True leadership communication, as the chapter emphasizes, isn’t about perfect theories—it’s about knowing when to apply them, when to adapt them, and when to rew […] “The Gap Between Leadership Theory and Reality”

  • Profile picture of Karim Elmenshawy

    When Life-Changing Realities Compete with Infomercials The cartoon depicting Joe’s “profound moment of clarity” being drowned out by a 1-800-GET-RICH infomercial perfectly encapsulates Chapter 8’s exploration of media saturation and audience passivity in mass communication. As the textbook notes, modern media environments bombard us with competing messages—often prioritizing flashy, profit-driven content (like infomercials) over meaningful reflection (p. 12). Joe’s distracted “OH, NEVER MIND…” mirrors the chapter’s warning about how hot media (McLuhan, p. 18)—low-participation, high-stimulation content—can override deeper cognitive engagement. This hit home during finals week when I absentmindedly scrolled through Instagram reels while reading about media consolidation. The textbook’s diffusion of innovation theory (p. 15) suddenly made sense: my brain, trained by algorithmic rewards, defaulted to bite-sized entertainment over complex ideas. Just like Joe, I’d chosen the “infomercial” (in my case, viral dog videos) over the “life-changing moment” (understanding how 90% of U.S. media is controlled by six conglomerates). The cartoon’s irony aligns with the chapter’s media literacy imperative (p. 22). Last month, my roommate nearly signed up for a shady “get rich quick” webinar before we researched its ties to disinformation networks. It was a real-world example of how profit-driven mass communication (p. 9) exploits distracted audiences. Yet the textbook offers hope: by recognizing these patterns—like Joe’s glazed-over epiphany—we can reclaim agency. Now, I use app timers to create “cold media” zones (p. 19) for reading, proving even small acts of resis […] “When Life-Changing Realities Compete with Infomercials”

Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International